Indian states were formed on the basis of language through the linguistic policy of India, which was implemented to address linguistic and cultural diversity. This policy aimed at reorganizing states along linguistic lines, leading to the creation of states where the majority of people spoke a particular language, promoting regional identity and language preservation.
How indian states were formed on the basis of language explain linguistic policy of india class 10?
The formation of Indian states on the basis of language was a result of the linguistic policy of India, a strategic decision made to address the diverse linguistic and cultural landscape of the country. This policy aimed to recognize and respect the linguistic identities of different regions, while promoting unity and preserving languages.
One of the key reasons behind the linguistic policy was the need to empower people by allowing them to govern and be governed in their own language. The policy aimed to create linguistic states where the majority of people spoke a particular language, thereby ensuring effective communication and administration. This approach helped to promote regional identity and preserve languages that were at risk of extinction.
The linguistic policy found its roots in the Indian freedom struggle and the emotional appeal for linguistic identity. One of the influential voices advocating for linguistic states was Potti Sreeramulu, a freedom fighter and proponent of the Telugu language. He fasted to death in 1952, demanding the creation of a separate state for Telugu-speaking people. This event brought significant attention to the linguistic aspirations of people and played a crucial role in the formation of linguistic states in India.
Interesting facts about the linguistic policy and formation of linguistic states in India:
The formation of linguistic states started with the creation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953. This was followed by the reorganization of states in 1956, where several linguistic states were formed, including Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and others.
The linguistic policy set a precedent for the formation of states based on language across the country. Today, India has 29 states and 8 union territories, with most states having a dominant regional language.
The linguistic policy faced some challenges and controversies. For instance, the demand for a separate state for speakers of the Telangana dialect within Andhra Pradesh led to the formation of Telangana as a separate state in 2014.
The linguistic policy has been successful in promoting regional languages and preserving cultural diversity. It has allowed for the development of literature, arts, and education in regional languages, strengthening the linguistic fabric of India.
Table: List of States Formed on the Basis of Language
| State | Language | Year of Formation |
| Andhra Pradesh | Telugu | 1953 |
| Maharashtra | Marathi | 1960 |
| Tamil Nadu | Tamil | 1956 |
| Karnataka | Kannada | 1956 |
| Kerala | Malayalam | 1956 |
| West Bengal | Bengali | 1950 |
| Punjab | Punjabi | 1966 |
| Gujarat | Gujarati | 1960 |
| Assam | Assamese | 1950 |
| Odisha | Odia | 1936 |
| Telangana | Telugu | 2014 |
In conclusion, the linguistic policy of India played a significant role in the formation of states on the basis of language. It aimed to recognize and preserve linguistic diversity while allowing for effective governance and administration. This policy has not only promoted regional identities but also contributed to the preservation and development of various languages in India. As Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, once said, “We live in a world in which the importance of language is obvious… and the harmonious growth of India demands effective links between different languages.”
This video contains the answer to your query
The video discusses the Mountbatten Plan of 1947, which aimed to divide British India and integrate Princely states into either India or Pakistan. Two boundary commissions were appointed to create the boundaries, resulting in imprecise census reports. Sir Cyril Radcliffe’s boundary line, known as the “Radcliffe Line,” became the separating line between India and Pakistan. Various techniques were used to persuade the Princely states to integrate into India, such as offering incentives like the Privy Purse. Jammu and Kashmir faced issues during integration due to Pakistan’s invasion, and India signed the Instrument of Accession with J&K, creating the Line of Control between India and Pakistan. After the accession, the new leader of Jammu and Kashmir became Sheikh Abdullah, and the next part is teased to discuss Article 35A and Article 370.
I found more answers on the Internet
The formation of linguistic states in India has strengthened democratic politics and integration. It has provided better representation, empowered local communities, preserved diverse cultures, and promoted social harmony. The Central Government initially resisted linguistic states, but states like Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Punjab were eventually created on the basis of languages. This has shown that the formation of linguistic states has actually made the country more united and made administration easier.
The creation of linguistic states in India has significantly strengthened democratic politics and integration. It has provided better representation, empowered local communities, preserved diverse cultures, and promoted social harmony.
The formation of linguistic states helped in strengthening the foundation of democracy and the process of national integration in India. … Linguistic reorganization also gave some uniform basis to the drawing of state boundaries. It did not lead to disintegration of the country as many had feared earlier.
The Central Government resisted linguistic states for some time. States like Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Punjab were created on the basis of languages. This has shown that the formation of linguistic states has actually made the country more united. It has also ‘ made administration easier.
Pretty much all the states in Peninsular India, North-east India and Western India were formed on the basis of language and culture. Even Telangana was formed on the basis of the unique culture of Telangana.
That leaves behind large parts of North India. However, even in North India, many parts have differences in terms of culture and up to some extent language.
In Punjab, the Sikhs wanted a homeland where they could dominate and finally, they created a state and a corresponding ethnicity with it.
Jharkhand separated from Bihar since the tribal people wanted a state where their voice could be heard.
J&K, a Union territory currently, was always separate and it differs from other states as it has a large Muslim population.
Most of the other North Indian states don’t have any glaring cultural or lingual differences amongst themselves and were not formed on the basis of language or culture.